Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Buildings Is Easier Than You Thought, page 01

Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Buildings Is Easier Than You Thought Introduction Life-cycle cost analysis is a method of determining the entire cost of a structure, product, or component over its expected useful life.

The cost of operating, maintaining, and using the item is added to the purchase price. For items that last longer than a couple of years, this is a more realistic way of evaluating cost than simply looking at the purchase price. Conducting a life-cycle cost analysis isn't as difficult as it appears. This report explains why and how to conduct life-cycle cost analyses and includes information on using software tools that reduce the difficulty of performing lifecycle cost analyses. Don't confuse life-cycle cost analyses with life-cycle assessments. Life-cycle assessments are used to evaluate the environmental costs associated with a product, process, structure, or activity. They identify energy and materials used and wastes released to the environment. Life-cycle assessments are explained in more detail in the "Life-Cycle Assessments Can Help You Make Sustainable Choices" section of this report. Highlights... Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Forest Service Buildings Is Smart Business Because funding is limited, Forest service service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, designers and facilities managers traditionally have focused on minimizing the initial cost of a structure. Unfortunately, this practice often has produced inefficient, short-lived structures with unnecessarily high operation and maintenance costs. Over the life of a building, operation and maintenance cost more than initial construction (figure 1). This is true both for new construction and for major replacement and improvement projects, so it makes sense to include operation and maintenance when evaluating cost effectiveness. Figure 1—Over 30 years, the cost of operation and maintenance for buildings is more than the initial construction cost; how much more depends on the building type and location. The 2006 study "Re-examining the Costs and Value Ratios of Owning and Occupying Buildings" by Graham Ive found the cost of operation and maintenance of office buildings to be about one and a half times the cost of initial construction. Other estimates put the cost of operation and maintenance at up to five times the cost of initial construction. Spending less over the long haul on buildings means you can spend more on the Forest Service mission. The largest expenditures over time for office buildings are the salaries and benefits for the employees who work there. This cost can be many times the cost of the building. For example, at the Missoula Technology and Development Center, salaries run around $16,400 a day. In less than 2 years after the new MTDC building was occupied in 2003, the amount paid to the employees who work there had exceeded the initial cost of construction of about $113 per square foot. Over 30 years, salaries and benefits will be about 18 times the initial cost of construction (figure 2). Because employee productivity is affected by the quality of the space where they work, employee productivity could be considered the single most important factor when evaluating the long-term cost effectiveness of any building design. Figure 2—Over 30 years, the costs of employee salaries and benefits dwarf both the original construction cost and the operation and maintenance cost of the office building where they work. Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is the tool that can tell you whether it makes economic sense to invest in a particular building component or system or whether one building design will be more cost effective over time than another. LCCA is particularly useful for comparing the costs of several options for equipment, systems, or buildings so you can make smart choices for a particular situation. For instance, an LCCA can help you determine whether it would be more cost effective to replace deteriorating window-mounted air conditioners in an office with new window-mounted air conditioners, a refrigerated central air conditioning system, or a ground-source cooling system. The answer may be different depending on climate, energy costs, and whether you plan to keep the building indefinitely or dispose of it in a few years. LCCA can account for all those variables and more. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Is Required for Forest Service Buildings Not only is it smart to use LCCA rather than just considering initial cost when evaluating design, lease, and purchase options, it's also required. Basic Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Calculation LCCA is a well-defined procedure for estimating the overall costs of project alternatives. It is commonly accepted throughout the business and engineering community. Basically, LCCA consists of adding all the initial and ongoing costs of the structure, product, or component over the time you expect to be using it, subtracting the value you can get out of it at the end of that time, and adjusting for inflation. A lot of information must be assembled and manipulated to accomplish a life-cycle cost analysis, but the basic formula is fairly straightforward. ASTM International, originally known as the American Society for Testing and Materials, develops and publishes technical standards for materials, products, systems, and services. ASTM standard E917- 02 "Standard Practice for Measuring Life-Cycle Costs of Buildings and Building Systems" ( detail.aspx?sku=ASTM+E917-05) is the standard industry procedure for analyzing life-cycle costs. More detailed information about applying LCCA to Federal projects is contained in the National Institute of Standards and Technology Handbook 135, Life-Cycle Costing Manual ( Two factors make it difficult to use the formula for large projects: The term "present value" in the formula describes costs that have been adjusted for inflation, or "discounted." The emphasis on present value is important when considering expensive structures or components that function for many decades, because inflation can influence affordability. It's usually not worth calculating present value when analyzing the life-cycle costs of small or short-lived structures, products, or components. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-94 ( provides the guidelines and discount rates that must be used when determining present value for life-cycle cost analysis on major Federal projects. Circular A-94 requires that life-cycle cost analysis be calculated in terms of "net present value." Net present value is computed by assigning monetary values to benefits and costs, discounting future benefits and costs using an appropriate discount rate, and subtracting the discounted costs from the discounted benefits. Discounting benefits and costs transforms gains and losses occurring in different time periods to a common unit of measurement. The LCCA formula works for all projects, large or small. It is much easier to calculate the life-cycle cost of a window air conditioner than of a large laboratory building. The next two sections explain how to use a modified formula to analyze simple items such as window air conditioners and how to use software to analyze complex items such as a laboratory or office building. Basic Formula for Calculating Life-Cycle Cost The formula for calculating life-cycle cost is: LCC = I + Repl - Res + E + W + OM&R + O Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Works for Small Decisions Life-cycle cost comparisons for building components or equipment (figure 3) can be accomplished relatively easily if there are no significant financing costs or differences in procurement costs among the options. The following information is needed for a simple lifecycle cost analysis: Assembling this information can be a challenge. If the information isn't available in the manufacturer's literature or easily available records, you may need to call the manufacturer or supplier or ask knowledgeable people what their experience has been. The reliability of the results depends directly on the quality of the input. If you have enough experience with the system, you may be able to get close enough using estimated operation and maintenance costs. Figure 3—Life-cycle cost analysis works well for small decisions such as finding the most cost-effective replacement for the air conditioning system at the assistant ranger's house at the Bessey Ranger Station (Nebraska National Forest in the Rocky Mountain Region). Choose a time period for the analysis and figure the cost for each system over that time period. The easiest time period to use is the shorter of: Simple Formula for Calculating Life-Cycle Cost Once you assemble all the information and choose your time period, plug the information for each of the systems into this formula: LCC = I + Repl - Res + L (OM&R) In case your memory of high school algebra is a little fuzzy, remember to multiply L times OM&R first, then add and subtract the factors in the order the equation is written. The result for each system is its life-cycle cost (LCC). You can compare the life-cycle costs of the different systems to learn which system is most cost effective over the time period you have chosen. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Works for Big Decisions An LCCA that evaluates large systems or whole buildings usually considers so much information that assembling and tracking all of it becomes a major undertaking. Adding to the complexity, LCCA normally is used to compare the cost of several alternative designs of buildings and building systems (figure 4). Fortunately, several public domain programs and many proprietary programs are available to help with LCCA. Figure 4—Comparing the life-cycle cost of several alternative designs often leads to selection of more durable and energy-efficient designs, such as the design for the Shoal Creek District Office (National Forests in Alabama, Southern Region). The guidelines and discount rates in OMB Circular A-94 must be used for determining present value for life-cycle cost analysis on Forest Service projects. This report only provides information on public domain software with free download that complies with A-94 requirements and includes A-94 discount rates. Software tools that meet these criteria include: Both of these software tools were evaluated by using data to build a 1,400 square-foot single family residence with both contractor standard construction and sustainable design options for a 25-year analysis period. The sustainable design version of this house was built in Missoula, MT, in 2003 (figure 5). Evaluation of the sustainable design option was based on actual costs of materials and actual consumption of water, electricity, and natural gas. Estimated costs of materials and consumption of water, electricity, and natural gas were used for the contractor standard construction option. Actual utility rates and financing costs were used for both options. Identical information was used for each software tool. Both software programs returned roughly equivalent information. They both showed life-cycle cost savings over 25 years of around $29,000, simple payback in about 10 years, and adjusted internal rate of return of around 11 percent for the sustainable design option. You can see the results in the "Example LCCA Reports" section at the end of this document. Figure 5—Public domain software tools were used to conduct life-cycle cost analyses on this 1,400 square-foot single family home. The results are given in the "Example LCCA Reports" section. Both computer programs require that the user have enough knowledge of building design and performance to recognize the factors that will be important to get an accurate result. This should not be a problem for experienced engineers and architects, but might present problems for others. As with the basic LCCA formula explained above, initial cost, expected useful life, average yearly operation, maintenance, and repair costs; expected major component life and replacement costs; and salvage or other residual value must be determined. As explained in the "Other Software Tools for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis" section, other software tools are available to help calculate these costs, particularly the energy costs of different components. The basic features, advantages, and limiting factors of the eVALUator and Building Life-Cycle Cost (BLCC) programs are explained below. Based on the comparison and use of both of these programs, eVALUator would be better for most Forest Service life-cycle cost analyses, especially those for less complex buildings. It's quick, it's easy, it's accurate, and it provides enough information to enable informed decisions. For projects where more detailed information on energy use or financing is needed, BLCC would be better. eVALUator The eVALUator is a Microsoft Windows-based program that was developed to calculate the life-cycle benefits of investments that improve building design. It analyzes the financial benefits of buildings that reduce energy cost, raise employee productivity, and enhance users' satisfaction. eVALUator software is available at tools/eVALUator.aspx. Before downloading the software, most Forest Service employees will need to get temporary administrative rights to install new software by going to and following the instructions. Advantages Limiting Factors Building Life-Cycle Cost The Building Life-Cycle Cost (BLCC) program was designed to analyze energy and water savings, but it can accommodate any life-cycle cost analysis. The latest version of BLCC—BLCC5—is programmed in Java with an XML file format. The user's guide is part of the BLCC5 Help system. BLCC 5.3-07 contains the following modules: BLCC software is available at Before downloading the software, most Forest Service employees will need to get temporary administrative rights to install new software by going to and following the instructions. BLCC 5.3- 08 became available just before this report was printed. It contains updated energy price indexes and discount factors, but is otherwise the same as BLCC 5.3-07. Advantages Limiting Factors Other Software Tools for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Software tools are available that can support or supplement LCCA. Most of these programs concentrate on energy efficiency and will perform a limited LCCA for energy use. The data from these programs can be entered into eVALUator or BLCC to produce more accurate life-cycle cost comparisons. Options for heating, ventilating, air conditioning, windows, insulation, lighting, shading, appliances, office equipment, water heating, building orientation, and roofing can be evaluated with software tools. Unfortunately, no single tool covers everything. An alphabetical list, brief summaries, and Web addresses of many of these software tools are available in the "Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Software" section at the end of this report. The Northern Region has developed a spreadsheet for calculating life cycle costs. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management employees can access the spreadsheet at